[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13970713#comment-13970713
 ] 

Uwe Schindler edited comment on SOLR-5988 at 4/16/14 12:01 PM:
---------------------------------------------------------------

bq. Do we need this file at all? It seems still in the trunk.

Yes, it is part of the HTML documentation, too. In trunk, the version is also 
Java 7, so the file is correct for all 3 branches: trunk, branch_4x and 
lucene_solr_4_8.

bq. Also, I thought there were bugs in Java 7 and Update 1+ is no longer a 
recommended version, but something released last week?

I will update this section together with the web site once our tests have 
finished. This goes in line with my release schedule.

bq. It's not a "Problem" as such, just trying to see if something like this 
still has value to the users or whether that information is better merged with 
where the users would actually look for it (CHANGES, Release Notes, etc).

It is part of the main documentation, so every user will see it. Also the 
CHANGES.txt and the release note will also contain it,

bq. Finally, the JavaBugs page, can we easily tell which of these issue still 
apply to Java 7. Or are they all now legacy for previous Solr release?

This page is up-to-date. It also contains a version number for every problem 
and if it is fixed. The links there are up-to date and also "older" bugs still 
apply (like NIOFSDirectory unuseable on Windows,...).


was (Author: thetaphi):
bq. Do we need this file at all? It seems still in the trunk.

Yes, it is part of the HTML documentation, too. The relase notes

bq. Also, I thought there were bugs in Java 7 and Update 1+ is no longer a 
recommended version, but something released last week?

I will update this section together with the web site once our tests have 
finished. This goes in line with my release schedule.

bq. It's not a "Problem" as such, just trying to see if something like this 
still has value to the users or whether that information is better merged with 
where the users would actually look for it (CHANGES, Release Notes, etc).

It is part of the main documentation, so every user will see it. Also the 
CHANGES.txt and the release note will also contain it,

bq. Finally, the JavaBugs page, can we easily tell which of these issue still 
apply to Java 7. Or are they all now legacy for previous Solr release?

This page is up-to-date. It also contains a version number for every problem 
and if it is fixed. The links there are up-to date and also "older" bugs still 
apply (like NIOFSDirectory unuseable on Windows,...).

> Update SYSTEM_REQUIREMENTS.txt to mention Java 7
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-5988
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5988
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: documentation
>    Affects Versions: 4.8
>            Reporter: Alexandre Rafalovitch
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: documentation
>             Fix For: 4.8
>
>
> Since Solr 4.8 will require Java 7 as a minimum, the description in the 
> SYSTEM_REQUIREMENTS.txt need to be updated too. 
> Or maybe it should be merged into release notes. All it will probably have is 
> use Java version after u56 (or whatever) and here is an obscure URL to known 
> bugs (still valid for Java 7?).



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to