[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6010?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13979749#comment-13979749
]
Ahmet Arslan commented on SOLR-6010:
------------------------------------
Cant you set {{hl.requireFieldMatch}} to true?
> Wrong highlighting while querying by date range with wild card in the end
> range
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6010
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6010
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: highlighter, query parsers
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Environment: java version "1.7.0_45"
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_45-b18)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 24.45-b08, mixed mode)
> Linux 3.2.0-23-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 10 20:39:51 UTC 2012 x86_64
> x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> Reporter: Mohammad Abul Khaer
> Labels: date, highlighting, range, solr
>
> Solr is returning wrong highlights when I have a date range query with wild
> card *in the end range*. For example my query *q* is
> {noformat}
> (porta)+activatedate:[* TO
> 2014-04-24T09:55:00Z]+expiredate:[2014-04-24T09:55:00Z TO *]
> {noformat}
> In the above query activatedate, expiredate are date fields. Their definition
> in schema file is as follows
> {code}
> <field name="activatedate" type="date" indexed="true" stored="false"
> omitNorms="true"/>
> <field name="expiredate" type="date" indexed="true" stored="false"
> omitNorms="true"/>
> {code}
> In the query result I am getting wrong highlighting information. Only
> highlighting result is show below
> {code}
> "highlighting": {
> "article:3605": {
> "title": [
> "The <em>creative</em> <em>headline</em> of this <em>story</em>
> <em>really</em> <em>says</em> it <em>all</em>"
> ],
> "summary": [
> "<em>Etiam</em> <em>porta</em> <em>sem</em> <em>malesuada</em>
> <em>magna</em> <em>mollis</em> <em>euismod</em> <em>aenean</em> <em>eu</em>
> <em>leo</em> <em>quam</em>. <em>Pellentesque</em> <em>ornare</em>
> <em>sem</em> <em>lacinia</em> <em>quam</em>."
> ]
> },
> "article:3604": {
> "title": [
> "The <em>creative</em> <em>headline</em> of this <em>story</em>
> <em>really</em> <em>says</em> it <em>all</em>"
> ],
> "summary": [
> "<em>Etiam</em> <em>porta</em> <em>sem</em> <em>malesuada</em>
> <em>magna</em> <em>mollis</em> <em>euismod</em> <em>aenean</em> <em>eu</em>
> <em>leo</em> <em>quam</em>. <em>Pellentesque</em> <em>ornare</em>
> <em>sem</em> <em>lacinia</em> <em>quam</em>.."
> ]
> }
> }
> {code}
> It should highlight only *story* word but it is highlighting lot other words
> also. What I noticed that this happens only if I have a wildcard * in the end
> range. If I change the above query and set a fixed date in the end range
> instead of * then solr return correct highlights. Modified query is shown
> below -
> {noformat}
> (porta)+activatedate:[* TO
> 2014-04-24T09:55:00Z]+expiredate:[2014-04-24T09:55:00Z TO
> 3014-04-24T09:55:00Z]
> {noformat}
> I guess its a bug in SOLR. If I use filter query *fq* instead of normal query
> *q* then highlighting result is OK for both queries.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
