[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6096?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14003804#comment-14003804
 ] 

Mikhail Khludnev commented on SOLR-6096:
----------------------------------------

please get me right, but I don't feel like sending 
{{<query>\_root\_:1</query>}} is a much problem at comparison to {{<id>1</id>}}

{{<delete><query>title:*</query></delete>}} can be fixed by nuking children 
right before removing parents explicitly
{code}
<delete>
<query>{!child of=type_s:parent}title:*</query>
<query>title:*</query>
</delete>
{code}

I share your concern that it not so cute as it could be. 

I've got one thought. what if you configure that darn \_root\_ field as aт 
uniqueKey? if it will work fine in all cases, but you wouldn't happy to specify 
such odd uniqueKey, we can create special DirectUpdateHandler2 which can use 
uniqueKey instead of \_root\_. WDYT?

> Support Update and Delete on nested documents
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-6096
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6096
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 4.7.2
>            Reporter: Thomas Scheffler
>              Labels: blockjoin, nested
>
> When using nested or child document. Update and delete operation on the root 
> document should also affect the nested documents, as no child can exist 
> without its parent :-)
> Example
> {code:xml|title=First Import}
> <doc>
>   <field name="id">1</field>
>   <field name="title">Article with author</field>
>   <doc>
>     <field name="name">Smith, John</field>
>     <field name="role">author</field>
>   </doc>
> </doc>
> {code}
> If I change my mind and the author was not named *John* but *_Jane_*:
> {code:xml|title=Changed name of author of '1'}
> <doc>
>   <field name="id">1</field>
>   <field name="title">Article with author</field>
>   <doc>
>     <field name="name">Smith, Jane</field>
>     <field name="role">author</field>
>   </doc>
> </doc>
> {code}
> I would expect that John is not in the index anymore. Currently he is. There 
> might also be the case that any subdocument is removed by an update:
> {code:xml|title=Remove author}
> <doc>
>   <field name="id">1</field>
>   <field name="title">Article without author</field>
> </doc>
> {code}
> This should affect a delete on all nested documents, too. The same way all 
> nested documents should be deleted if I delete the root document:
> {code:xml|title=Deletion of '1'}
> <delete>
>   <id>1</id>
>   <!-- implying also
>     <query>_root_:1</query>
>    -->
> </delete>
> {code}
> This is currently possible to do all this stuff on client side by issuing 
> additional request to delete document before every update. It would be more 
> efficient if this could be handled on SOLR side. One would benefit on atomic 
> update. The biggest plus shows when using "delete-by-query". 
> {code:xml|title=Deletion of '1' by query}
> <delete>
>   <query>title:*</query>
>   <!-- implying also
>     <query>_root_:1</query>
>    -->
> </delete>
> {code}
> In that case one would not have to first query all documents and issue 
> deletes by those id and every document that are nested.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to