Can you have a custom UpdateRequestProcessor in the chain that just skips processing such requests?
Regards, Alex. Personal website: http://www.outerthoughts.com/ Current project: http://www.solr-start.com/ - Accelerating your Solr proficiency On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi; > > As you know that commitWithin is a nice feature for Solr. You can either use > it via URL as a query parameter or within documents to index. As like: > > {"add":{ > "doc":{"id":"change.me","title":"change.me"},"boost":1.0,"overwrite":true,"commitWithin":1000}} > > However I think that is is not a feature of data and it should not be > permitted within data to index. > > I have a use case for it: I have designed an infrastructure that drops url > parameters that is not related to data (as like commit or commitWithin). > However as Solr supports a non-data related feature within data as a meta > data I could not drop it and I have to analyze all data or customize Solr. > > What do you think about that? Does it a good design to allow something like > that within data as meta data? > > Thanks; > Furkan KAMACI --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
