[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5706?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14008394#comment-14008394
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-5706:
------------------------------------
I checked the patch on SOLR-5944 and I only see this line related to
updateNumericDocValue:
{code}
writer.updateNumericDocValue(updateTerm, field.name(),
field.numericValue().longValue());
{code}
So it already assumes the update value isn't null right?
> Don't allow unsetting values through DocValues updates
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5706
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5706
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: core/index
> Reporter: Shai Erera
> Assignee: Shai Erera
>
> Spinoff from LUCENE-5680: we shouldn't allow unsetting values through
> DocValues updates, at least not until there's a real usecase for it. This
> will simplify a lot of the internal code, as well make the numeric update API
> work w/ primitive {{long}} instead of {{Long}}.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
