Is there any story on figuring out why there are so many false "failures" on the nightly builds? We try to tell people that trunk is "pretty darn good code, better tested than 1.4 ever was", which is true.
But putting on my skeptical hat and pretending that I was getting that statement and trying to decide whether to go with a release or trunk, I'd take one look at the failure rate of trunk and say "You've got to be kidding". I've dug a bit and seen "failures" with the notation "all tests passed". Huh??? Don't misunderstand me, I think this is really a perception issue not a code quality issue. But I also think that it's a hurdle to overcome, and a showstopper for some that there are so many "red balls" on the Hudson trunk solr dashboard. Best Erick
