[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14038413#comment-14038413
 ] 

David Smiley commented on SOLR-3585:
------------------------------------

[[email protected]] I'm thinking it would just be yet another URP that if 
you want to use you have to add it; not by default -- let the masses try it 
first.  And you ask why not make StreamingSolrServer's use of CUSS 
configurable?  That's a good point.  To me it's a matter of principle; let the 
receiving end (the server) dictate the concurrency it can handle, not the 
sender.  And I like the idea of one peer-wise connection instead of 'N' as well.

> processing updates in multiple threads
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-3585
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-3585
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: update
>    Affects Versions: 4.0-ALPHA, 5.0
>            Reporter: Mikhail Khludnev
>         Attachments: SOLR-3585-oome-and-default-tests-chain.patch, 
> SOLR-3585.patch, SOLR-3585.patch, SOLR-3585.patch, SOLR-3585.patch, 
> SOLR-3585.patch, multithreadupd.patch, report.tar.gz
>
>
> Hello,
> I'd like to contribute update processor which forks many threads which 
> concurrently process the stream of commands. It may be beneficial for users 
> who streams many docs through single request. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to