[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6121?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14067996#comment-14067996
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-6121:
------------------------------------
bq. If folks think a magic default is a better i've got no serious objections
+1, I don't think there's much to gain from forcing a user to specify a
tiebreaker. We don't force them to do it for non cursorMark sorts.
> cursorMark should accept sort without the uniqueKey
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6121
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6121
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: David Smiley
> Priority: Minor
>
> If you are using the cursorMark (deep paging) feature, you shouldn't *have*
> to add the uniqueKey to the sort parameter. If the user doesn't do it, the
> user obviously doesn't care about the uniqueKey order relative to whatever
> other sort parameters they may or may not have provided. So if sort doesn't
> have it, then Solr should simply tack it on at the end instead of providing
> an error and potentially confusing the user. This would be more user
> friendly.
> Quoting Hoss from
> [SOLR-5463|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5463?focusedCommentId=14011384&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14011384]:
> {quote}
> The reason the code currently throws an error was because i figured it was
> better to force the user to choose which tie breaker they wanted (asc vs
> desc) then to just magically pick one arbitrarily.
> If folks think a magic default is a better i've got no serious objections –
> just open a new issue.
> {quote}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
