[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12968751#action_12968751
 ] 

Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2268:
---------------------------------------

bq. The spatially enabled databases follow the "Simple Features Specification 
for SQL" spec which defines the ironically named "Well Known Text" format (WKT) 
for representing points polygons etc
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Well-known_text

Hmm, seems a bit verbose.  For instance, we will already know it is a poly by 
it's field type and the extra parens seem like they could easily be replaced.  
Then again, if it is a standard...

bq. Using any AWT class can introduce issues related to servers and headless 
mode. I'd recommend instead the JTS Java Topology Suite which has a lot of 
useful stuff - including WKT readers and writers
http://goo.gl/IyNeD

AWT won't work anyway, as it only takes ints.  I've found a simple ASL Polygon 
class that I think does what we need it.  JTS is good, but it is LGPL.  :-(

> Add support for Point in Polygon searches
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-2268
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2268
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
>            Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
>
> In spatial applications, it is common to ask whether a point is inside of a 
> polygon.  Solr could support two forms of this: 
> # A field contains a polygon and the user supplies a point.  If it does, the 
> doc is returned.  
> # A document contains a point and the user supplies a polygon.  If the point 
> is in the polygon, return the document
> With both of these case, it would be good to support the negative assertion, 
> too.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to