[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14085508#comment-14085508
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-6319:
------------------------------------
It would also be trivial to produce examples where over-requesting by any given
amount would also fail to produce correct results. Over-requesting does not
fix the problem, it's simply a trade-off... increased cost for decreased chance
of incorrect results. It was initial my judgement that over-requesting was
worth it for sorting by count, but probably not worth it for sorting by index.
Even in that case, the degree that we over-request by was a guess. If you have
a different intuition about the best amount of over-requesting, I'm all ears.
> if mincount > 1, facet.field needs to overrequest even if facet.sort=index
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6319
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6319
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Assignee: Hoss Man
>
> Discovered this while working on SOLR-2894. the logic for distributed
> faceting ignores over requesting (beyond the user specified facet.limit) if
> the facet.sort is index order -- but the rationale for doing this falls apart
> if the user has specified a facet.mincount > 1
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
