[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6328?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14087967#comment-14087967
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-6328:
--------------------------------
Examples of the problem...
* facet.field{noformat}
$ curl -sS
'http://localhost:8983/solr/select?facet.field=inStock&facet.missing=true&facet.limit=1&facet=true&q=*:*&rows=0&omitHeader=true&wt=json&indent=true'
{
"response":{"numFound":32,"start":0,"docs":[]
},
"facet_counts":{
"facet_queries":{},
"facet_fields":{
"inStock":[
"true",17,
null,11]},
"facet_dates":{},
"facet_ranges":{},
"facet_intervals":{}}}
$ curl -sS
'http://localhost:8983/solr/select?facet.field=inStock&facet.missing=true&facet.limit=0&facet=true&q=*:*&rows=0&omitHeader=true&wt=json&indent=true'
{
"response":{"numFound":32,"start":0,"docs":[]
},
"facet_counts":{
"facet_queries":{},
"facet_fields":{
"inStock":[]},
"facet_dates":{},
"facet_ranges":{},
"facet_intervals":{}}}
{noformat}
* facet.pivot{noformat}
$ curl -sS
'http://localhost:8983/solr/select?facet.pivot=manu_id_s,inStock&facet.missing=true&facet.limit=1&facet=true&q=*:*&rows=0&omitHeader=true&wt=json&indent=true'
{
"response":{"numFound":32,"start":0,"docs":[]
},
"facet_counts":{
"facet_queries":{},
"facet_fields":{},
"facet_dates":{},
"facet_ranges":{},
"facet_intervals":{},
"facet_pivot":{
"manu_id_s,inStock":[{
"field":"manu_id_s",
"value":"corsair",
"count":3,
"pivot":[{
"field":"inStock",
"value":true,
"count":3}]},
{
"field":"manu_id_s",
"value":null,
"count":14,
"pivot":[{
"field":"inStock",
"value":true,
"count":3},
{
"field":"inStock",
"value":null,
"count":11}]}]}}}
$ curl -sS
'http://localhost:8983/solr/select?facet.pivot=manu_id_s,inStock&facet.missing=true&facet.limit=0&facet=true&q=*:*&rows=0&omitHeader=true&wt=json&indent=true'
{
"response":{"numFound":32,"start":0,"docs":[]
},
"facet_counts":{
"facet_queries":{},
"facet_fields":{},
"facet_dates":{},
"facet_ranges":{},
"facet_intervals":{},
"facet_pivot":{
"manu_id_s,inStock":[]}}}
{noformat}
I discovered this while working on SOLR-2894 where i initially thought it was a
bug specific to (distributed) pivot faceting, but later realized facet.field
also has the same problem. There is a commented out distributed pivot test for
this situation in DistributedFacetPivotLargeTest as part of SOLR-2894.
(annotated with "SOLR-6328")
> facet.limit=0 returns no counts, even if facet.missing=true
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6328
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6328
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Priority: Minor
>
> facet.limit constraints the number of term values returned for a field when
> using facet.field or facet.pivot, but that limit is (suppose) to be
> independent of facet.missing, which adds an additional count beyond the
> facet.limit for docs that are "missing" that field.
> This works fine for facet.limit >= 1, but if you use
> {{facet.limit=0&facet.missing=true}} (ie: you are only interested in the
> missing count) you get no counts at all -- not even for the missing count.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
