I think likely the failure was false -- if the machine is stressed, the last thread(s) may in fact do zero iterations through the while loop, and then the test falsely fails.
Mike On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Robert Muir <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Michael McCandless > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hmm why no repro command? That's no good. Maybe if a test fails only >> due to threads other than main, we fail to print repro? >> > > I fixed this in trunk: good catch... but i'm wishing we had Shai's > seed that he used to create the failure. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
