[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5656?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14093272#comment-14093272
 ] 

Scott Lindner commented on SOLR-5656:
-------------------------------------

Does this depend on SOLR-6237? Your comments above seem to imply that it's not, 
but conceptually can't you end up with multiple replicas pointing to the same 
location on disk (admittedly I haven't dug into your code)?  If so, what impact 
does this have with multiple solr instances (i.e. multiple replicas of a given 
shard) pointing to the same location on disk where each could be accepting 
write changes? 



> Add autoAddReplicas feature for shared file systems.
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-5656
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5656
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Mark Miller
>            Assignee: Mark Miller
>         Attachments: SOLR-5656.patch, SOLR-5656.patch, SOLR-5656.patch, 
> SOLR-5656.patch
>
>
> When using HDFS, the Overseer should have the ability to reassign the cores 
> from failed nodes to running nodes.
> Given that the index and transaction logs are in hdfs, it's simple for 
> surviving hardware to take over serving cores for failed hardware.
> There are some tricky issues around having the Overseer handle this for you, 
> but seems a simple first pass is not too difficult.
> This will add another alternative to replicating both with hdfs and solr.
> It shouldn't be specific to hdfs, and would be an option for any shared file 
> system Solr supports.
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/23371/



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to