[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6386?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14100042#comment-14100042
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-6386:
--------------------------------
Erick: i'm not sure i see how they are related -- but if you think you've fixed
this issue, try reverting r1618490 locally and then beasting
TestDistributedSearch to confirm.
> make secondary ordering of facet.field values (and facet.pivot?) consistently
> deterministic
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6386
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6386
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Hoss Man
> Assignee: Erick Erickson
>
> as a fluke of how the SOLR-2894 patch evolved, it wound up adding a bit of
> testing of distributed facet.field on date fields (see [r1617789 changes to
> TestDistributedSearch|https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/dev/trunk/solr/core/src/test/org/apache/solr/TestDistributedSearch.java?r1=1617789&r2=1617788&pathrev=1617789])
> ... but this started triggering some random failures due to facet
> constraints with identical values being sorted differently between the
> distributed query and the single node control query.
> We should make the facet.field (and facet.pivot) code order constraints with
> tied counts consistently regardless of whether it's a distrib search or not.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
