[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2810?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12970862#action_12970862
 ] 

Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2810:
-----------------------------------------

Compression 1.0 was a different use case.  That was for compressing a single 
field and I agree it was a waste.  Where in my email did I say that users had 
to use it?  We have all kinds of alternate things.  And you are so hung up on 
the word compression.  I will change the name of this issue to something else 
without the word in it so you don't think this has to be some form of gzip, but 
instead is about alternate storage options that will benefit particular use 
cases.

> Stored Fields Compression
> -------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2810
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2810
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Store
>            Reporter: Grant Ingersoll
>            Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
>
> In some cases (logs, HTML pages w/ boilerplate, etc.), the stored fields for 
> documents contain a lot of redundant information and end up wasting a lot of 
> space across a large collection of documents.  For instance, simply 
> compressing a typical log file often results in > 75% compression rates.  We 
> should explore mechanisms for applying compression across all the documents 
> for a field (or fields) while still maintaining relatively fast lookup (that 
> being said, in most logging applications, fast retrieval of a given event is 
> not always critical.)  For instance, perhaps it is possible to have a part of 
> storage that contains the set of unique values for all the fields and the 
> document field value simply contains a reference (could be as small as a few 
> bits depending on the number of uniq. items) to that value instead of having 
> a full copy.  Extending this, perhaps we can leverage some existing 
> compression capabilities in Java to provide this as well.  
> It may make sense to implement this as a Directory, but it might also make 
> sense as a Codec, if and when we have support for changing storage Codecs.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to