: So according to those issues, it seems others also think that end1 <= end2 : is also a "correct" behavior of SNQ (in case ordered=true, and
A more accurate way ot put it may be that *some* people felt like it was the lest counter-intuitive behavior they could think of, and everybody else either didn't have an opinion, didn't share an opinion, or didn't understand spans enough to know if they had an opinion. : start1==start2). Was there a reason these issues were not resolved (e.g. : LUCENE-3120)? I'm asking if there was additional discussion where people : raised objections against this, or was it just a matter of lack of : time/focus? you could probably find more wisps of discussion about spans and nearness in general in the list archives, but i don't remember anything really concrete beyond the thread mentioned in LUCENE-3120 (and the earlier thread linked ot from it) ... and the only reason i remember that is because it wsa easy to find from the jira... https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/201105.mbox/%3c614c529d389a5944b351f7dfb7594f240126d...@uksrpblkexb01.detica.com%3E https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-dev/200612.mbox/%[email protected]%3E : > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3120 : > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3371 : > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3229 -Hoss http://www.lucidworks.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
