[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5939?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14130013#comment-14130013 ]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-5939: --------------------------------------- I extracted the 410.cfs.zip file and ran checkindex on it: {noformat} C:\Users\Uwe Schindler\Desktop>java -cp lucene-core-4.11.0-SNAPSHOT.jar org.apache.lucene.index.CheckIndex index NOTE: testing will be more thorough if you run java with '-ea:org.apache.lucene...', so assertions are enabled Opening index @ index Segments file=segments_3 numSegments=5 version=4.11.0 id=90e2ef40edf76628be731bdca9c8faab format= 1 of 5: name=_0 docCount=10 version=4.11.0 id=90e2ef40edf76628be731bdca9c8faa4 codec=Lucene410 compound=true numFiles=4 size (MB)=0.008 diagnostics = {timestamp=1409886841199, os=Mac OS X, os.version=10.9.4, source=flush, lucene.version=4.11.0, os.arch=x86_64, jav a.version=1.7.0_60, java.vendor=Oracle Corporation} has deletions [delGen=1] test: open reader.........OK test: check integrity.....OK test: check live docs.....OK [1 deleted docs] test: fields..............OK [25 fields] test: field norms.........OK [7 fields] test: terms, freq, prox...OK [64 terms; 360 terms/docs pairs; 333 tokens] test (ignoring deletes): terms, freq, prox...OK [67 terms; 400 terms/docs pairs; 370 tokens] test: stored fields.......OK [63 total field count; avg 7 fields per doc] test: term vectors........OK [54 total vector count; avg 6 term/freq vector fields per doc] test: docvalues...........OK [15 docvalues fields; 4 BINARY; 7 NUMERIC; 2 SORTED; 1 SORTED_NUMERIC; 1 SORTED_SET] 2 of 5: name=_1 docCount=10 version=4.11.0 id=90e2ef40edf76628be731bdca9c8faa5 codec=Lucene410 compound=true numFiles=3 size (MB)=0.008 diagnostics = {timestamp=1409886841241, os=Mac OS X, os.version=10.9.4, source=flush, lucene.version=4.11.0, os.arch=x86_64, jav a.version=1.7.0_60, java.vendor=Oracle Corporation} no deletions test: open reader.........OK test: check integrity.....OK test: check live docs.....OK test: fields..............OK [25 fields] test: field norms.........OK [7 fields] test: terms, freq, prox...OK [67 terms; 400 terms/docs pairs; 370 tokens] test: stored fields.......OK [70 total field count; avg 7 fields per doc] test: term vectors........OK [60 total vector count; avg 6 term/freq vector fields per doc] test: docvalues...........OK [15 docvalues fields; 4 BINARY; 7 NUMERIC; 2 SORTED; 1 SORTED_NUMERIC; 1 SORTED_SET] 3 of 5: name=_2 docCount=10 version=4.11.0 id=90e2ef40edf76628be731bdca9c8faa6 codec=Lucene410 compound=true numFiles=3 size (MB)=0.008 diagnostics = {timestamp=1409886841273, os=Mac OS X, os.version=10.9.4, source=flush, lucene.version=4.11.0, os.arch=x86_64, jav a.version=1.7.0_60, java.vendor=Oracle Corporation} no deletions test: open reader.........OK test: check integrity.....OK test: check live docs.....OK test: fields..............OK [25 fields] test: field norms.........OK [7 fields] test: terms, freq, prox...OK [67 terms; 400 terms/docs pairs; 370 tokens] test: stored fields.......OK [70 total field count; avg 7 fields per doc] test: term vectors........OK [60 total vector count; avg 6 term/freq vector fields per doc] test: docvalues...........OK [15 docvalues fields; 4 BINARY; 7 NUMERIC; 2 SORTED; 1 SORTED_NUMERIC; 1 SORTED_SET] 4 of 5: name=_3 docCount=5 version=4.11.0 id=90e2ef40edf76628be731bdca9c8faa7 codec=Lucene410 compound=true numFiles=3 size (MB)=0.007 diagnostics = {timestamp=1409886841292, os=Mac OS X, os.version=10.9.4, source=flush, lucene.version=4.11.0, os.arch=x86_64, jav a.version=1.7.0_60, java.vendor=Oracle Corporation} no deletions test: open reader.........OK test: check integrity.....OK test: check live docs.....OK test: fields..............OK [25 fields] test: field norms.........OK [7 fields] test: terms, freq, prox...OK [52 terms; 200 terms/docs pairs; 185 tokens] test: stored fields.......OK [35 total field count; avg 7 fields per doc] test: term vectors........OK [30 total vector count; avg 6 term/freq vector fields per doc] test: docvalues...........OK [15 docvalues fields; 4 BINARY; 7 NUMERIC; 2 SORTED; 1 SORTED_NUMERIC; 1 SORTED_SET] 5 of 5: name=_4 docCount=1 version=4.11.0 id=90e2ef40edf76628be731bdca9c8faa9 codec=Lucene410 compound=true numFiles=3 size (MB)=0.001 diagnostics = {timestamp=1409886841318, os=Mac OS X, os.version=10.9.4, source=flush, lucene.version=4.11.0, os.arch=x86_64, jav a.version=1.7.0_60, java.vendor=Oracle Corporation} no deletions test: open reader.........OK test: check integrity.....OK test: check live docs.....OK test: fields..............OK [2 fields] test: field norms.........OK [1 fields] test: terms, freq, prox...OK [1 terms; 1 terms/docs pairs; 0 tokens] test: stored fields.......OK [2 total field count; avg 2 fields per doc] test: term vectors........OK [0 total vector count; avg 0 term/freq vector fields per doc] test: docvalues...........OK [0 docvalues fields; 0 BINARY; 0 NUMERIC; 0 SORTED; 0 SORTED_NUMERIC; 0 SORTED_SET] No problems were detected with this index. {noformat} So this index was created with 4.11.0, no idea how this happened! So the RM Ryan seem to created a wrong index! > 4.10.1 cannot read 4.10 indexes > ------------------------------- > > Key: LUCENE-5939 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5939 > Project: Lucene - Core > Issue Type: Bug > Reporter: Robert Muir > Priority: Blocker > > Thank you mike for the smoketester addition. It failed because 4.10.1 was not > verifying backwards compatibility against 4.10 > However, when i added the indexes (svn copied from branch-4x), the test fails. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org