[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2824?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12972973#action_12972973
 ] 

Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-2824:
--------------------------------------

You are obviously more familiar with the code than me :)

> optimizations for bufferedindexinput
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2824
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2824
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.1, 4.0
>            Reporter: Robert Muir
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2824.patch
>
>
> along the same lines as LUCENE-2816:
> * the readVInt/readVLong/readShort/readInt/readLong are not optimal here 
> since they defer to readByte. for example this means checking the buffer's 
> bounds per-byte in readVint instead of per-vint.
> * its an easy win to speed this up, even for the vint case: its essentially 
> always faster, the only slower case is 1024 single-byte vints in a row, in 
> this case we would do a single extra bounds check (1025 instead of 1024)

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to