2014-10-31 16:13 GMT+01:00 Uwe Schindler <[email protected]>: > Hi > > Hey this line confused me, too. But this should not be a regression, it > just misses an "Optimization", right? This might explain why he sees no > real performance. > > The problem of Tomaso: He sees no hits for some documents in > TermRangeQuery/Wildcard: The reason is that empty terms are not *indexed* > but they appear in *DocValues* - so he sees the difference between the > queries. >
I'll try to find out if that's a bug Tommaso > > Uwe > > ----- > Uwe Schindler > H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen > http://www.thetaphi.de > eMail: [email protected] > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adrien Grand [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Friday, October 31, 2014 3:59 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: "field exists" queries and benchmarks > > > > On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 2:03 PM, Tommaso Teofili > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Which version of Lucene? > > > > > > > > > I'm using trunk > > > > Then it might be due to > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6038. Maybe you can try > > again with the patch applied? > > > > -- > > Adrien > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional > > commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >
