On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Smiley, David W. <dsmi...@mitre.org> wrote: > Thanks for letting me know about this Rob. I think geonames is much simpler > (and much less data) to work with than wikipedia. It's plain tab-delimited > and I like that it includes the population. I'll press forward with my > benchmark module based patch. I can relatively easily switch between the > lat-lon type and my geohash type since they both conform to the > SpatialQueriable interface, and so consequently I don't need two complete > Lucene checkouts. I had to add Solr & spatial as dependencies to the > benchmark module but it's worth it to me. >
well in my opinion there isn't a reason why benchmark couldn't be moved to /modules and depend on solr... others might disagree but i would prefer that benchmark be a module where you can benchmark everything. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
