[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6606?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14223508#comment-14223508
 ] 

Timothy Potter commented on SOLR-6606:
--------------------------------------

How does merge policy affect SOLR-6606? It seems to me that even if you 
synchronize the commit boundaries between leader and replica, the merge 
schedulers will be running at different times on leader / replica so the 
segments get out-of-sync anyway, right? Admittedly, I don't know too much about 
how the replication handler determines which segments to pull from the leader 
... just wondering if you investigated this question any?

> In cloud mode the leader should distribute autoCommits to it's replicas
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-6606
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6606
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Varun Thacker
>             Fix For: 5.0, Trunk
>
>         Attachments: SOLR-6606.patch, SOLR-6606.patch
>
>
> Today in SolrCloud different replicas of a shard can trigger auto (hard) 
> commits at different times. Although the documents which get added to the 
> system remain consistent the way the segments gets formed can be different 
> because of this.
> The downside of segments not getting formed in an identical fashion across 
> replicas is that when a replica goes into recovery chances are that it has to 
> do a full index replication from the leader. This is time consuming and we 
> can possibly avoid this if the leader forwards auto (hard) commit commands to 
> it's replicas and the replicas never explicitly trigger an auto (hard) commit.
> I am working on a patch. Should have it up shortly



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to