: -0 on the setup-ide-* standardization - I like the shorter form. If : there were 19 different supported IDEs, I would agree. But with just : two, what's the gain?
i wasn't trying to argue for any gain -- just standaridization. i wasn't overly worried baout what hte standardization looked like, but frnakly this seems like the wrong type of thing to be worried about having "short forms" ... it's all about the huffman encoding: "ant test" is way better then "ant build-and-run-all-junit-tests-recursively" but that's becuase it gets run by everybody over and over and over again. If these IDE targets are things people will have to use exactly once when they first do a checkout on a particular dev machine (and as i understand it that's what we're tlaking about here) then why do they need to be short? doesn't clear and self documenting win out in that type of situation? </rant> honestly, i don't care that much what they're called since as we all agree, we don't expect to have a lot of them -- it would just be nice if they were named consistent with eachother, and easy to understand (if that requires looking at the README where it's explained that they are for IDEs, that works for me.) -Hoss --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
