[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6803?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14238199#comment-14238199
]
Neil Ireson commented on SOLR-6803:
-----------------------------------
The test file has two versions:
1) The first one creates a new set of 1,000,000 documents for each iteration of
the number of values, so that the facet/pivot search is on all the values, i.e.
facet.limit == -1.
2) The second (faster) version creates one set of data with 1,000,000
documents, which have the 1,000,000 values and then uses varying facet.limit to
determine the number of values in the search.
The above tables only report the second test.
PS Thank you, the tables look correct now.
> Pivot Performance
> -----------------
>
> Key: SOLR-6803
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6803
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 4.10.2
> Reporter: Neil Ireson
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: PivotPerformanceTest.java
>
>
> I found that my pivot search for terms per day was taking an age so I knocked
> up a quick test, using a collection of 1 million documents with a different
> number of random terms and times, to compare different ways of getting the
> counts.
> 1) Combined = combining the term and time in a single field.
> 2) Facet = for each term set the query to the term and then get the time
> facet
> 3) Pivot = use the term/time pivot facet.
> The following two tables present the results for version 4.9.1 vs 4.10.1, as
> an average of five runs.
> 4.9.1 (Processing time in ms)
> |Values (#) | Combined (ms)| Facet (ms)| Pivot (ms)|
> |100 | 22| 21| 52|
> |1000 | 178| 57| 115|
> |10000 | 1363| 211| 310|
> |100000 | 2592| 1009| 978|
> |500000 | 3125| 3753| 2476|
> |1000000 | 3957| 6789| 3725|
> 4.10.1 (Processing time in ms)
> |Values (#) | Combined (ms)| Facet (ms)| Pivot (ms)|
> |100 | 21| 21| 75|
> |1000 | 188| 60| 265|
> |10000 | 1438| 215| 1826|
> |100000 | 2768| 1073| 16594|
> |500000 | 3266| 3686| 99682|
> |1000000 | 4080| 6777| 208873|
> The results show that, as the number of pivot values increases (i.e. number
> of terms * number of times), pivot performance in 4.10.1 get progressively
> worse.
> I tried to look at the code but there was a lot of changes in pivoting
> between 4.9 and 4.10, and so it is not clear to me what has cause the
> performance issues. However the results seem to indicate that if the pivot
> was simply a combined facet search, it could potentially produce better and
> more robust performance.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
