[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14244044#comment-14244044
]
Pawel Rog commented on SOLR-2497:
---------------------------------
Hi,
This issue contains information that it is blocked by LUCENE-3080. From other
side LUCENE-3080 was not resolved. So SOLR-2497 don't essentially need
LUCENE-3080?
I'm asking because of
"https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3080?focusedCommentId=13734900&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-13734900";.
When I removed lines mentioned in LUCENE-3080 from DefaultSolrHighlighter
highlighting of Trie* fields seems to work. I'd be glad if you can provide me
with any feedback.
> Move Solr to new NumericField stored field impl of LUCENE-3065
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2497
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2497
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Uwe Schindler
> Assignee: Uwe Schindler
> Fix For: 3.2, 4.0-ALPHA
>
> Attachments: SOLR-2497-trunk.patch, SOLR-2497.patch, SOLR-2497.patch,
> SOLR-2497.patch, SOLR-2497.patch
>
>
> This implements the changes to NumericField (LUCENE-3065) in Solr. TrieField
> & Co would use NumericField for indexing and reading stored fields. To enable
> this some missing changes in Solr's internals (Field -> Fieldable) need to be
> done. Also some backwards compatible stored fields parsing is needed to read
> pre-3.2 indexes without reindexing (as the format changed a little bit and
> Document.getFieldable returns NumericField instances now).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
