[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2218?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12978958#action_12978958
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-2218:
--------------------------------
bq. Unfortunately, I need the results by highest score. Does fq support score?
As i mentioned..
bq. if you are sorting on score this becomes tricker, but should be possible
using the "frange" parser wit the "query" function)
I think something like..
{code}
LAST_SCORE=5.6
...?q=...&fq={!frange u=5.6}query($q)&sort=score+desc
{code}
...should work (but you have the issue of docs with identical scores to worry
about -- something that's not a problem with uniqueIds)
> Performance of start= and rows= parameters are exponentially slow with large
> data sets
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-2218
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2218
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Build
> Affects Versions: 1.4.1
> Reporter: Bill Bell
>
> With large data sets, > 10M rows.
> Setting start=<large number> and rows=<large numbers> is slow, and gets
> slower the farther you get from start=0 with a complex query. Random also
> makes this slower.
> Would like to somehow make this performance faster for looping through large
> data sets. It would be nice if we could pass a pointer to the result set to
> loop, or support very large rows=<number>.
> Something like:
> rows=1000
> start=0
> spointer=string_my_query_1
> Then within interval (like 5 mins) I can reference this loop:
> Something like:
> rows=1000
> start=1000
> spointer=string_my_query_1
> What do you think? Since the data is too great the cache is not helping.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
