[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14266728#comment-14266728
]
Will Butler commented on SOLR-1387:
-----------------------------------
facet.contains would be great to have. Any general comments on the worst case
performance? Does it approach the cost of reading all possible facet values for
a field?
> Add more search options for filtering field facets.
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1387
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1387
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: search
> Reporter: Anil Khadka
> Assignee: Alan Woodward
> Fix For: 4.9, Trunk
>
> Attachments: SOLR-1387.patch
>
>
> Currently for filtering the facets, we have to use prefix (which use
> String.startsWith() in java).
> We can add some parameters like
> * facet.iPrefix : this would act like case-insensitive search. (or --->
> facet.prefix=a&facet.caseinsense=on)
> * facet.regex : this is pure regular expression search (which obviously would
> be expensive if issued).
> Moreover, allowing multiple filtering for same field would be great like
> facet.prefix=a OR facet.prefix=A ... sth like this.
> All above concepts could be equally applicable to TermsComponent.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
