[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12980660#action_12980660
]
Salman Akram edited comment on SOLR-1604 at 1/12/11 6:41 AM:
-------------------------------------------------------------
I integrated the patch and its working fine however, there were couple of
issues.
One is related to un-ordered proximity which seems to be fixed with the inOrder
parameter but its not working for me (doesn't give any error but its still
ordered). I will try to get the patch again coz I also merged it in early Nov
so maybe it was applied after that.
The other issue is that although proximity search works with phrases BUT its
not very accurate e.g. If I want to search "a b" within 10 words of "c" the
query would end up being "a b c"~10 but this will also return cases where "a"
is not necessarily together with "b". Any scenario where these 3 words are
within 10 words of each other will match.
Is it possible in SOLR to do what I mentioned above? Any other patch? Something
like " "a b" c "~10...
Note: I was going through Lucene-1486 and there Ahmet mentioned that
"Specifically : "(john johathon) smith"~10 " works perfectly. For me it seems
there is no difference if I put the parenthesis or not.
Thanks!
was (Author: salman741):
I integrated the patch and its working fine however, there were couple of
issues. One is already resolved with the above un-ordered proximity parameters.
The issue is that although proximity search works with phrases BUT its not very
accurate e.g. If I want to search "a b" within 10 words of "c" the query
would end up being "a b c"~10 but this will also return cases where "a" is not
necessarily together with "b". Any scenario where these 3 words are within 10
words of each other will match.
Is it possible in SOLR to do what I mentioned above? Any other patch? Something
like " "a b" c "~10...
Note: I was going through Lucene-1486 and there Ahmet mentioned that
"Specifically : "(john johathon) smith"~10 " works perfectly. For me it seems
there is no difference if I put the parenthesis or not.
Thanks!
> Wildcards, ORs etc inside Phrase Queries
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1604
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1604
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: search
> Affects Versions: 1.4
> Reporter: Ahmet Arslan
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: Next
>
> Attachments: ComplexPhrase.zip, ComplexPhrase.zip, ComplexPhrase.zip,
> ComplexPhrase.zip, ComplexPhraseQueryParser.java, SOLR-1604.patch
>
>
> Solr Plugin for ComplexPhraseQueryParser (LUCENE-1486) which supports
> wildcards, ORs, ranges, fuzzies inside phrase queries.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
