[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6224?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14310833#comment-14310833
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on LUCENE-6224:
---------------------------------------------------------
Commit 1658082 from [~rcmuir] in branch 'dev/trunk'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1658082 ]
LUCENE-6224: cut over more package.htmls
> move package.htmls to package-info.java for better tooling support
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6224
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6224
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Task
> Reporter: Robert Muir
>
> Today, on java8, if you typo a link in the package documentation of
> org.apache.lucene.search (package.html) like this:
> {code}
> {@link org.apache.lucene.search.TermQueryX TermQuery}
> {code}
> then javadoc will silently do the wrong thing, it will generate a
> <code>xxx</code> block with no link at all.
> On the other hand, if instead we do it as package-info.java, then it shows up
> in big red letters as an error in my IDE, doclint catches it at compile time,
> etc, and we ensure our links are doing what we want.
> {code}
> [javac]
> /home/rmuir/workspace/trunk/lucene/core/src/java/org/apache/lucene/search/package-info.java:75:
> error: reference not found
> [javac] {@link org.apache.lucene.search.TermQueryX TermQuery}
> {code}
> I think we should cutover? this also helps us rely less on our own linting
> scripts long term because now doclint is checking these files too.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
