On 3/2/2015 10:34 AM, Reitzel, Charles wrote:
>
> Hi Ram,
>
>  
>
> It appears the problem is that the old solr/jetty process is actually
> still running when the new solr/jetty process is started.   That’s the
> problem that needs fixing.
>
>  
>
> This is not a rare problem in systems with worker threads dedicated to
> different tasks.   These threads need to wake up in response to the
> shutdown signal/command, as well the normal inputs.
>
>  
>
> It’s a bug I’ve created and fixed a couple times over the years …
> :-)    I wouldn’t know where to start with Solr.  But, as I say,
> re-using the port is a band-aid.  I’ve yet to see a case where it is
> the best solution.
>

I can't say whether the lack of the reuse option on the stop port
binding is a real problem.  I can say that I've never had a problem with
my init script for the 4.x example jetty, which *DOES* use the STOPPORT
and STOPKEY options.  I know that there have been times when Solr has
been completely unresponsive and the init script has been forced to use
the -9 signal.  You can find this init script (in redhat and ubuntu
varieties) here:

http://wiki.apache.org/solr/ShawnHeisey

Thanks,
Shawn


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to