RE: Creating 5.1 branch soon ...

Wed, 25 Mar 2015 11:54:03 -0700

If the new JSON API is marked experimental, then I have no issue. Didn't know that was the plan, sorry for the noise.

Steve
From: Timothy Potter [[email protected]]
Sent: March 25, 2015 2:44 PM
To: lucene dev
Subject: Re: Creating 5.1 branch soon ...

Sorry - I didn't intend any offense with the precedent statement, only the fact that SOLR-6348 has released features already, namely SOLR-6351 and SOLR-6354 are in 5.0 already.

On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 11:33 AM, Yonik Seeley <[email protected]> wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Timothy Potter <[email protected]> wrote:
> That could be months of haggling and I don't think we should hold up all the
> other nice features, improvements, and bug fixes for too much longer as we
> don't want to slow down adoption of 5.x

+1

> Without any judgement of what was done in SOLR-7214 and given that SOLR-6348
> has precedent,

I'll disagree with the precedent bit... I worked on this stuff (and
presented it at ApacheCon) long before SOLR-6348 was opened.

> why not mark the new JSON API as experimental, giving us
> freedom to unify the approaches over the next several releases?

+1 for experimental - that had been my (uncommunicated) plan anyway.
We don't want to lock down APIs prematurely, it's really important to
get them right!

-Yonik

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to