You didn't put that comment on the issue, just in case you forgot.

Can you point me to some discussions? I don't advocate for or against
making Solr APIs fully RESTful, just curious about the details.

Shai

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Noble Paul <noble.p...@gmail.com> wrote:

> There is a deeper reason. We realised REST is not efficient for a lot of
> operations. So, we deliberately avoided it
> On Mar 26, 2015 12:13 AM, "Shai Erera (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>     [
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7312?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14381484#comment-14381484
>> ]
>>
>> Shai Erera commented on SOLR-7312:
>> ----------------------------------
>>
>> How about changing the API to actually conform to RESTful? ;)
>>
>> I know it would be a huge change (therefore trunk only I believe), just
>> wondering if there is a reason for the current API, where modifying actions
>> are allowed via GET as well. Is it for convenience reasons only, or is
>> there a deeper one?
>>
>> > "REST" API is not REST
>> > ----------------------
>> >
>> >                 Key: SOLR-7312
>> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7312
>> >             Project: Solr
>> >          Issue Type: Bug
>> >          Components: Server
>> >    Affects Versions: 5.0
>> >            Reporter: Mark Haase
>> >            Assignee: Noble Paul
>> >
>> > The documentation refers to a "REST" API over and over, and yet I don't
>> see a REST API. I see an HTTP API but not a REST API. Here are a few things
>> the HTTP API does that are not RESTful:
>> > * Offers RPC verbs instead of resources/nouns. (E.g. schema API has
>> commands like "add-field", "add-copy-field", etc.)
>> > * Tunnels non-idempotent requests (like creating a core) through
>> idempotent HTTP verb (GET).
>> > * Tunnels deletes through HTTP GET.
>> > * PUT/POST confusion, POST used to update a named resource, such as the
>> Blob API.
>> > * Returns `200 OK` HTTP code even when the command fails. (Try adding a
>> field to your schema that already exists. You get `200 OK` and an error
>> message hidden in the payload. Try calling a collections API when you're
>> using non-cloud mode: `200 OK` and an error message in the payload. Gah.)
>> > * Does not provide link relations.
>> > * HTTP status line contains a JSON payload (!) and no 'Content-Type'
>> header for some failed commands, like `curl -X DELETE
>> http://solr:8983/solr/admin/cores/foo`
>> <http://solr:8983/solr/admin/cores/foo>
>> > * Content negotiation is done via query parameter (`wt=json`), instead
>> of `Accept` header.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>> (v6.3.4#6332)
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>

Reply via email to