On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Terry Smith <sheb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. It seems a pity to make queries just nearly > immutable. Do you have any interest in adding a boost parameter to clone() > so they really could be immutable?
We could have a single method, but if we do it I would rather do it in a different change since it would affect all queries as opposed to only a handful of them. Also there is some benefit in having clone() and setBoost() in that cloning and setters are things that are familiar to everyone. If we replace them with a new method, we would need to specify its semantics. (Not a blocker, just wanted to mention what the pros/cons are in my opinion.) -- Adrien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
