[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6382?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14494465#comment-14494465
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-6382:
-------------------------------------
+1
Maybe the static index test+index should sit in backwards/ so that it can go
away in a future version when those indexes cannot be read?
> Don't allow position = Integer.MAX_VALUE going forward
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6382
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6382
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: Trunk, 5.2
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-6382.patch, LUCENE-6382.patch, LUCENE-6382.patch
>
>
> Spinoff from LUCENE-6308, where Integer.MAX_VALUE position is now used as a
> sentinel during position iteration to indicate that there are no more
> positions.
> Where IW now detects int overflow of position, it should now also detect ==
> Integer.MAX_VALUE.
> And CI should note corruption if a segment's version is >= 5.2 and has
> Integer.MAX_VALUE position.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
