[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12986502#action_12986502
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2883:
--------------------------------------
One issue here is the different purposes for lucene and solr function queries.
Solr's function queries have always evolved at a rapid pace (and are continuing
to evolve) to support higher level features and interfaces in Solr. They are
able to evolve rapidly because they are seen more as an implementation detail
rather than interface classes, and I'd hate to lose that. So if we do try to
make Solr's function queries more accessible to lucene users (again), it should
be as a Solr module. As we can see from history and usage, function queries
are critically important to Solr, but are obviously not to Lucene.
> Consolidate Solr & Lucene FunctionQuery into modules
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2883
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2883
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: Search
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: Simon Willnauer
> Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> Spin-off from the [dev list |
> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@lucene.apache.org/msg13261.html]
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
