[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7543?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14543982#comment-14543982
 ] 

Kevin Watters commented on SOLR-7543:
-------------------------------------

Hi Yonik,  thanks for chiming in!  Yup, you can think of this as a multi-step 
join.  In fact,  I use the graph operator with a maxDepth of 1 to implement an 
inner join.
I like things to be consistent (it's easier for others to grok that way), we 
can rename the fromField and the toField to be "from" and "to". When it comes 
to the GraphQueryParser(Plugin),  I'm open to whatever the community likes and 
whatever is consistent with the other parsers out there. 
 (I've always been a bit thrown by the !parser_name syntax, which is why I also 
have a client side object model so that I programmatically build up an 
expression, I serialize that expression over to my custom parser that 
deserializes and converts into the appropriate lucene query objects.  ).  I 
suppose I just want to make sure that the  "v=my_start_query"  can be any 
arbitrary lucene query.   
I also still need to work up some richer examples and test cases as part of 
this ticket.


> Create GraphQuery that allows graph traversal as a query operator.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-7543
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7543
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: search
>            Reporter: Kevin Watters
>            Priority: Minor
>
> I have a GraphQuery that I implemented a long time back that allows a user to 
> specify a "startQuery" to identify which documents to start graph traversal 
> from.  It then gathers up the edge ids for those documents , optionally 
> applies an additional filter.  The query is then re-executed continually 
> until no new edge ids are identified.  I am currently hosting this code up at 
> https://github.com/kwatters/solrgraph and I would like to work with the 
> community to get some feedback and ultimately get it committed back in as a 
> lucene query.
> Here's a bit more of a description of the parameters for the query / graph 
> traversal:
> q - the initial start query that identifies the universe of documents to 
> start traversal from.
> fromField - the field name that contains the node id
> toField - the name of the field that contains the edge id(s).
> traversalFilter - this is an additional query that can be supplied to limit 
> the scope of graph traversal to just the edges that satisfy the 
> traversalFilter query.
> maxDepth - integer specifying how deep the breadth first search should go.
> returnStartNodes - boolean to determine if the documents that matched the 
> original "q" should be returned as part of the graph.
> onlyLeafNodes - boolean that filters the graph query to only return 
> documents/nodes that have no edges.
> We identify a set of documents with "q" as any arbitrary lucene query.  It 
> will collect the values in the fromField, create an OR query with those 
> values , optionally apply an additional constraint from the "traversalFilter" 
> and walk the result set until no new edges are detected.  Traversal can also 
> be stopped at N hops away as defined with the maxDepth.  This is a BFS 
> (Breadth First Search) algorithm.  Cycle detection is done by not revisiting 
> the same document for edge extraction.  
> This query operator does not keep track of how you arrived at the document, 
> but only that the traversal did arrive at the document.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to