[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6371?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14555155#comment-14555155
]
Adrien Grand commented on LUCENE-6371:
--------------------------------------
I was just trying to update some Spans code and had some compile errors because
of this new span collection API. Nothing bad so far but this made me read more
about the new APIs and I'm a bit worried about the introduced complexity
(SpanCollector, buffer(), bufferedCollector(), etc.). Maybe that's just me not
being familiar enough with spans but is the introduced complexity worth the
improvements? I have not looked into details yet but if we need more complex
handling for only some queries maybe this should move to sandbox as suggested
above to keep at least core simple?
> Improve Spans payload collection
> --------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6371
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6371
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Paul Elschot
> Assignee: Alan Woodward
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.2
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-6371.patch, LUCENE-6371.patch, LUCENE-6371.patch
>
>
> Spin off from LUCENE-6308, see the comments there from around 23 March 2015.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
