[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14563088#comment-14563088
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-6507:
-------------------------------------
The last fail i understand now. its a test bug, because i randomized
lockfactories in newDirectory().
This test calls newDirectory() over the same existing index, but switches up
lockfactories. Native doesn't delete its file (for obvious reasons), but simple
depends on the existence of the file, so it times out.
I will fix the patch...
> NativeFSLock.close() can invalidate other locks
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6507
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6507
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Simon Willnauer
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 4.10.5, 5.2
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-6507.patch, LUCENE-6507.patch, LUCENE-6507.patch,
> LUCENE-6507.patch, LUCENE-6507.patch, LUCENE-6507.patch
>
>
> the lock API in Lucene is super trappy since the lock that we return form
> this API must first be obtained and if we can't obtain it the lock should not
> be closed since we might ie. close the underlying channel in the NativeLock
> case which releases all lock for this file on some operating systems. I think
> the makeLock method should try to obtain and only return a lock if we
> successfully obtained it. Not sure if it's possible everywhere but we should
> at least make the documentation clear here.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
