[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12988079#action_12988079
 ] 

Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2324:
------------------------------------------

bq. Jason I don't think special tracking of updateDocument deletes will work. 
EG, the document I'm replacing could be in another DWPT?

Right.  I think that's why we'd need to keep track of [unfortunately] the 
delTerms of all DWPTs per DWPT.  Then when a DWPT flushes it's deletes and 
documents, it'll flush delTerms to the other DWPTs.  Whereas today, in the 
updateDoc call we're flushing the delTerm to all DWPTs (this could be too 
early), which would logically seem to break atomicity.  

bq. we have to do a full stop on getReader or commit?

Update doc isn't sync'd so we'd need to stop it as well?  Where are we gaining 
flush concurrency then?  

> Per thread DocumentsWriters that write their own private segments
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2324
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2324
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Index
>            Reporter: Michael Busch
>            Assignee: Michael Busch
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Realtime Branch
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2324-SMALL.patch, LUCENE-2324-SMALL.patch, 
> LUCENE-2324-SMALL.patch, LUCENE-2324-SMALL.patch, LUCENE-2324-SMALL.patch, 
> LUCENE-2324.patch, LUCENE-2324.patch, LUCENE-2324.patch, lucene-2324.patch, 
> lucene-2324.patch, LUCENE-2324.patch, test.out, test.out, test.out, test.out
>
>
> See LUCENE-2293 for motivation and more details.
> I'm copying here Mike's summary he posted on 2293:
> Change the approach for how we buffer in RAM to a more isolated
> approach, whereby IW has N fully independent RAM segments
> in-process and when a doc needs to be indexed it's added to one of
> them. Each segment would also write its own doc stores and
> "normal" segment merging (not the inefficient merge we now do on
> flush) would merge them. This should be a good simplification in
> the chain (eg maybe we can remove the *PerThread classes). The
> segments can flush independently, letting us make much better
> concurrent use of IO & CPU.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to