[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7659?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14581446#comment-14581446
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on SOLR-7659:
-------------------------------------------------------
Commit 1684811 from [~elyograg] in branch 'dev/branches/branch_5x'
[ https://svn.apache.org/r1684811 ]
SOLR-7659: Rename and reorganize
DirectoryFileStream.releaseCommitPointAndExtendReserve. (merge trunk r1684808)
> DirectoryFileStream.releaseCommitPointAndExtendReserve -- should it extend
> first?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-7659
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-7659
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: replication (java)
> Affects Versions: 5.2.1
> Reporter: Shawn Heisey
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 5.3, Trunk
>
> Attachments: SOLR-7659.patch, SOLR-7659.patch
>
>
> After a misunderstanding on my part, leading to an incorrect documentation
> edit, [~shalinmangar] helped me understand how the commit reserve duration
> works.
> The resulting discussion on the dev list brought up a possible problem in
> ReplicationHandler. We wondered whether it might be possible for another
> thread to sneak in a commit point deletion in between the two statements
> found in the releaseCommitPointAndExtendReserve method on the
> DirectoryFileStream object. If it is safe to do so, I propose reversing
> those two statements so the reserve extension is done before releasing the
> commit point.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
