[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14594309#comment-14594309
 ] 

David Smiley commented on LUCENE-6590:
--------------------------------------

RE BoostQuery

+1 what a great idea Rob!  I too have found bugs related to improper boost 
handling from time to time (just yesterday in fact).   Heh, lets face it; every 
one of us have.  It's so easy to overlook.  I get that we're not starting from 
scratch (Yonik's point) but I'd hate to see such reasoning blocking Lucene from 
being the Lucene we want it to be.  Pragmatically that means, I think, doing 
this in 6.0 and having a transition to this from 5.0.  It's a pain but if 
someone is stepping up to do the work then great.

> Explore different ways to apply boosts
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-6590
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6590
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Follow-up from LUCENE-6570: the fact that all queries are mutable in order to 
> allow for applying a boost raises issues since it makes queries bad cache 
> keys since their hashcode can change anytime. We could just document that 
> queries should never be modified after they have gone through IndexSearcher 
> but it would be even better if the API made queries impossible to mutate at 
> all.
> I think there are two main options:
>  - either replace "void setBoost(boost)" with something like "Query 
> withBoost(boost)" which would return a clone that has a different boost
>  - or move boost handling outside of Query, for instance we could have a 
> (immutable) query impl that would be dedicated to applying boosts, that 
> queries that need to change boosts at rewrite time (such as BooleanQuery) 
> would use as a wrapper.
> The latter idea is from Robert and I like it a lot given how often I either 
> introduced or found a bug which was due to the boost parameter being ignored. 
> Maybe there are other options, but I think this is worth exploring.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to