Yes, version-agnostic URL is much better. I haven't found it since I've
found only direct links to solr javadoc for earlier versions. I will update
it now.

Changing redirection from 5_2_0 to 5_2_1 would be nice but isn't necessary
(if 5.2.1 api is similar to 5.2.0).

Also, is there any page on lucene/solr site where direct links to javadoc
are present? I didn't find one.


вт, 7 июля 2015 г. в 1:49, Shawn Heisey <[email protected]>:

> On 7/6/2015 3:58 PM, Apache Wiki wrote:
> > - The "keys" of the cache are field names, and the values are [[
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/org/apache/solr/request/UnInvertedField.html|large
> data structures mapping docIds to values]].
> > + The "keys" of the cache are field names, and the values are [[
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/5_2_1/solr-core/org/apache/solr/search/facet/UnInvertedField.html|large
> data structures mapping docIds to values]].
>
> I'm thinking that the version number probably should not be part of this
> URL.  It looks like the package of this class changed from search to
> search.facet.
>
> I think the URL probably should point here:
>
>
> https://lucene.apache.org/solr/api/solr-core/org/apache/solr/search/facet/UnInvertedField.html
>
> And that the redirect should be changed to go to the 5_2_1 version
> instead of 5_2_0.
>
> Would that be correct?
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
> --
Best regards,
Konstantin Gribov

Reply via email to