Just to be clear, are you proposing to release 3.1 of Lucene, Solr, or both?
Upayavira On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 11:00 -0500, "Robert Muir" <rcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > Per Shai's previous note, we decided we wanted to work towards a 3.1 > release (he mentioned a target date of march 1, don't think this will > happen) > > Despite this, I propose we do a 'casual freeze' on the 3.x code base > in 7 days time, in other words we agree for a few weeks we will focus > on bugs and tests only in branch_3x and try to shorten, not length the > list of issues in JIRA (unless these issues are bugs!). > > The reason I say this, versus creating a release branch right now, is > that I think we should take advantage of our stable branch (branch_3x) > and avoid branching until the last minute: when we are ready to make > an RC. > > I think any features/improvements that cannot be done in 7 days should > really wait for 3.2 instead... and we shouldn't wait a year for that > one to release either... we have a stable branch, lets take advantage > of it. > > So, please let me know your opinions on this proposal, if there is > consensus, then in 7 days I will move all non-bug/non-test 3.1 issues > to 3.2. > > And of course, trunk would be unaffected by all of this... we should > never freeze trunk. I would suggest we just delay backporting of new > features developed in trunk during this process, keeping their jira > issues open and set for Fix Version 3.2 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org > > --- Enterprise Search Consultant at Sourcesense UK, Making Sense of Open Source --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
