[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2886?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12990439#comment-12990439
 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2886:
-------------------------------------

We are still not using 2 of the simple64 selectors, but in the simple64 paper 
it discusses
using these wasted bits to represent 120 and 240 "all ones"... I think we 
should do this?


> Adaptive Frame Of Reference 
> ----------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-2886
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2886
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Codecs
>            Reporter: Renaud Delbru
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>         Attachments: LUCENE-2886_simple64.patch, 
> LUCENE-2886_simple64_varint.patch, lucene-afor.tar.gz
>
>
> We could test the implementation of the Adaptive Frame Of Reference [1] on 
> the lucene-4.0 branch.
> I am providing the source code of its implementation. Some work needs to be 
> done, as this implementation is working on the old lucene-1458 branch. 
> I will attach a tarball containing a running version (with tests) of the AFOR 
> implementation, as well as the implementations of PFOR and of Simple64 
> (simple family codec working on 64bits word) that has been used in the 
> experiments in [1].
> [1] http://www.deri.ie/fileadmin/documents/deri-tr-afor.pdf

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to