Robert: Just create a JIRA and submit it. It would be great if there were a test that illustrated this, but I'm not sure how that would be written. See: https://wiki.apache.org/solr/HowToContribute for the general bits on checking out code, creating and attaching patches and the like.
Note that the naming conventions are SOLR-XXXX.patch and we use the same name for multiple versions. Best, Erick On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Robert Krüger <[email protected]> wrote: > Just to follow up on this: Replacing getCanonicalHostName() by getHostName() > would solve the problem AFAICS and e.g. Logback does exactly that for > exactly the same purpose. > > http://logback.qos.ch/xref/ch/qos/logback/core/util/ContextUtil.html > > How do I submit a patch? Via this mailing list? > > Best regards, > > Robert > > On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 6:57 PM, Robert Krüger <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> I am tracking down a problem with huge startup delays of a solr instance >> and tracked it down to this code in SystemInfoHandler: >> >> private void init() { >> try { >> InetAddress addr = InetAddress.getLocalHost(); >> hostname = addr.getCanonicalHostName(); >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ this is where it hangs >> } catch (UnknownHostException e) { >> //default to null >> } >> } >> >> The setup I have gives me no control over the local network configuration >> as solr is delivered as part of a larger software that users install on >> their machines and that has worked really well and it is technically fit for >> this purpose just as other no-sql stores or rdbmss. However, when our >> software users have problems like a reverse lookup not working because they >> work in a VPN environment (which in no other way affects the correct >> operation of solr) they currently have to wait a minute for solr startup >> (otherwise about a second) because two timeouts of these lookups happen, one >> when setting up the container, another for the core and that only to have >> the "host" info contain a name that was reverse-looked up. >> >> Would it be acceptable to submit a patch that allows this to be disabled >> overidden by a system property be acceptable? I.e. suppress the lookup and >> just use what can be retrieved about the host without a lookup (e.g. the ip >> address). >> >> Best regards, >> >> Robert >> > > > > -- > Robert Krüger > Managing Partner > Lesspain GmbH & Co. KG > > www.lesspain-software.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
