[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6759?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14723867#comment-14723867
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-6759:
--------------------------------------------
bq. There's no way, remember, to even represent such a condition with integers
But then why didn't the +/- Integer.MAX_VALUE solve it? Is it possible the
non-lenient encode is overflowing int?
bq. So it has to be decision-making in the bkd descent that is problematic.
OK but in this test case there is no BKD code... I mean, the logic is all in
the test (splitting up cells and recursing). Maybe there is a bug in that
logic?
> Integrate lat/long BKD and spatial 3d, part 2
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-6759
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6759
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Attachments: LUCENE-6699.patch, LUCENE-6699.patch, LUCENE-6699.patch,
> LUCENE-6699.patch, LUCENE-6699.patch, LUCENE-6699.patch, LUCENE-6699.patch,
> LUCENE-6699.patch, LUCENE-6699.patch, LUCENE-6699.patch, LUCENE-6699.patch,
> LUCENE-6699.patch, LUCENE-6699.patch
>
>
> This is just a continuation of LUCENE-6699, which became too big.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
