Yes, most features aren't implemented, we started but both have other OSS projects that take priority. Luke.Net was more a playground to learn WPF.
Aaron Powell Umbraco Core Team Member | FunnelWeb Team Member http://www.aaron-powell.com | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype: aaron.l.powell | MSN: [email protected] -----Original Message----- From: Sergey Mirvoda [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, 19 February 2011 1:08 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Luke.Net Alternatively we can reimplement it from scratch. Using Aarron's code as a working prototype. Also looks like my most wished (and somewhat advanced) features (testing Analizers and Luke plugins) is not implemented. On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Aaron Powell <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah I'm actually quite lax about remembering to put license on my code. > I've just thrown up the MIT license on it. > > I'll speak to my colleague, but I know I didn't work on it during work > time > > Aaron Powell > Umbraco Core Team Member | FunnelWeb Team Member > > http://www.aaron-powell.com | http://twitter.com/slace | Skype: > aaron.l.powell | MSN: [email protected] > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Friday, 18 February 2011 10:50 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Luke.Net > > On 2011-02-18, Troy Howard wrote: > > > Sergey is already planning to include the Apache License header in > > the files when he imports them. Other than that, is there any legal > > process we need to go through to bring this code into the Lucene.Net > > fold? > > Yes, absolutely. > > First of all you can't change the license without Aaron's consent - > and that of all other people who have contributed to Luke.NET so far > (I'm assuming it is just Aaron's colleague). I've just performed a > cursory look right now and can't find any information about Luke.NET's > current license. > > Second we'd need a software grant by Aaron and his colleague. > Alternatively Aaron and his colleague could sign ICLAs but for > complete code imports a sofware grant is preferred. See < > http://www.apache.org/licenses/>. If the code was created on company > time Aaron may need to check with his employer and have the employer > sign a SGA or CCLA, but he'll know better than us. > > Finally we'd have to follow the IP-Clearance process < > http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html> before the code > can be imported. > > Sorry if this sounds a bit like too much legal hassle, but this is the > only way the ASF can be sure it has all necessary rights to actually > distribute the code. > > Stefan > -- --Regards, Sergey Mirvoda
