[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14937734#comment-14937734 ]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-8109: -------------------------------- Isn't this situation already pretty sell resolved more robustly by CloneFieldUpdateProcessorFactory + FirstFieldValueUpdateProcessorFactory instead of using copyField? Particularly because it can be configured on a per processor chain basis, so you can pick "first" in some cases, or "max" in others (depending on wh/what/where the docs are coming from) https://lucene.apache.org/solr/5_3_0/solr-core/org/apache/solr/update/processor/FirstFieldValueUpdateProcessorFactory.html https://lucene.apache.org/solr/5_3_0/solr-core/org/apache/solr/update/processor/CloneFieldUpdateProcessorFactory.html In general i think update processors are a much better way to address problems like this moving forward, rather then adding more features at the "schema" level (like new copyField options) ... particularly when you consider how low level copyField operations are, and how they (by definition) *must* happen after both atomic update operations about any distributed processing for cloud setups > Option to Copy just the first value from a multivalued field > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: SOLR-8109 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8109 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Improvement > Components: Schema and Analysis > Affects Versions: 5.3 > Reporter: Gus Heck > Attachments: SOLR-8109.patch > > > Provide a firstValueOnly boolean option for copyField -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org