Hoss Man created SOLR-8110:
------------------------------
Summary: Start enforcing field naming recomendations in next X.0
release?
Key: SOLR-8110
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8110
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Hoss Man
For a very long time now, Solr has made the following "recommendation"
regarding field naming conventions...
bq. field names should consist of alphanumeric or underscore characters only
and not start with a digit. This is not currently strictly enforced, but other
field names will not have first class support from all components and back
compatibility is not guaranteed. ...
I'm opening this issue to track discussion about if/how we should start
enforcing this as a rule instead (instead of just a "recommendation") in our
next/future X.0 (ie: major) release.
The goals of doing so being:
* simplify some existing code/apis that currently use hueristics to deal with
lists of field and produce strange errors when the huerstic fails (example:
ReturnFields.add)
* reduce confusion/pain for new users who might start out unaware of the
recommended conventions and then only later encountering a situation where
their field names are not supported by some feature and get frustrated because
they have to change their schema, reindex, update index/query client
expectations, etc...
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]