[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14945144#comment-14945144
 ] 

Ludovic Boutros commented on SOLR-8117:
---------------------------------------

hmm, I see, the rules should be considered as a mandatory state before and 
after the collection creation.
This type of condition (<1) should be considered as invalid. I misunderstood 
the rule configuration.

Thank you Paul.

I will try to reproduce the other behavior: 

sometimes a collection creation is allowed and sometimes not with the same 
cluster and the same rules.

I use these two rules:

rule=shard:*,host:*,replica:<2
rule=shard:*,cores:<2

The last time, I had to retry 3 times to finally create a collection (7 shards, 
2 replicas per shard).

The demo cluster contains 4 hosts, 16 nodes (4 per host), 14 empty nodes.

With your explaination, it should never be allowed to create this collection 
because all nodes contain 2 cores after the collection creation.
Or perhaps, the two rules are not applied the way I think.

By the way, the behavior should always be the same.


> Rule-based placement issue with 'cores' tag 
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SOLR-8117
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-8117
>             Project: Solr
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: SolrCloud
>    Affects Versions: 5.3, 5.3.1
>            Reporter: Ludovic Boutros
>            Assignee: Noble Paul
>         Attachments: SOLR-8117.patch
>
>
> The rule-based placement fails on an empty node (core count = 0) with 
> condition 'cores:<1'.
> It also fails if current core number is equal to the core number in the 
> condition - 1. 
> During the placement strategy process, the core counts for a node are 
> incremented when all the rules match.
> At the end of  the code, an additional verification of all the conditions is 
> done with incremented core count and therefore it fails.
> I don't know why this additional verification is needed and removing it seems 
> to fix the issue.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to