[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6863?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14979524#comment-14979524
 ] 

Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-6863:
-------------------------------------

{quote}
Here is a patch. It detects sparsity by checking if less than 10% documents 
have a value.
{quote}

Please, put a minimum count like 1024 where this starts to make sense, so types 
arent flipping back and forth during ordinary NRT search. And where did 10% 
come from? It seems far too aggressive. In previous work we determined much 
lower thresholds to work better (e.g. 3%).

> Store sparse doc values more efficiently
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-6863
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6863
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Adrien Grand
>            Assignee: Adrien Grand
>         Attachments: LUCENE-6863.patch
>
>
> For both NUMERIC fields and ordinals of SORTED fields, we store data in a 
> dense way. As a consequence, if you have only 1000 documents out of 1B that 
> have a value, and 8 bits are required to store those 1000 numbers, we will 
> not require 1KB of storage, but 1GB.
> I suspect this mostly happens in abuse cases, but still it's a pity that we 
> explode storage requirements. We could try to detect sparsity and compress 
> accordingly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to